Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> writes: >> True, but from the perspective of the affected code, the question is >> basically "did you call expression_planner() yet". So I like this >> naming for that connection, whereas something based on "transformation" >> doesn't really connect to anything in existing function names.
> Fair enough.
Pushed like that, then. Thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
