On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 01:12:24PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > I find the above sentence odd. What is its purpose? > > I cannot count how many times I have seen the complaint "I have run ALTER > DEFAULT > PRIVILEGES, and now when some other user creates a table, the permissions are > unchanged". People tend to think that if you omit FOR ROLE, the change > applies to > PUBLIC. > > Your improved documentation of "target_role" already covers that somewhat, so > if > you don't like the repetition, I'm alright with that. I just thought it might > be worth stating it explicitly. > > I think your patch is fine and ready to go.
Patch applied back to PG 16. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
