On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 06:42:12PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Moreover there is no such completion for example for the command (it shows
> > only first column):
> >
> > CREATE INDEX ON test (
>
> Noted (I misunderstood at first: you just mean there's precedent that column
> names aren't completed, except maybe the first).
Yes, exactly. It was about the precedent.
> I can revise patch to not complete attributes in analyze; but, I think that
> means that this will have to complete to table names:
>
> postgres=# ANALYZE tt (a ,
> alu_enodeb_201601 information_schema.
> alu_enodeb_201602 jrn_pg_buffercache
> ...
>
> .. since, without checking for matching parens, it has no idea whether to
> complete with rels or atts. WDYT?
IMHO, I'd leave the code as simple as possible. It is up to you of
course. But it is easy to add completion for a first attribute, by
adding the condition (and leave other attributes without completion):
else if (HeadMatches1("VACUUM") && TailMatches1("("))
COMPLETE_WITH_ATTR(prev2_wd, "");
> > > - "SERVER", "INDEX", "LANGUAGE", "POLICY", "PUBLICATION",
> > > "RULE",
> > > + "SERVER", "INDEX", "LANGUAGE", "POLICY", "PUBLICATION",
> >
> > Is this a typo? I think still there is a possibility to comment rules.
>
> Not in PG11(b1) (note, that's a custom table)
> postgres=# COMMENT ON RULE pg_settings_u IS 'asdf';
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "IS"
> ...
> Remove deprecated COMMENT ON RULE syntax
> e8d016d81940e75c126aa52971b7903b7301002e
Oh, I understood what it is it here. Those commit removed the syntax:
COMMENT ON RULE rule_name
But still there is the syntax:
COMMENT ON RULE rule_name ON table_name
I can run the command:
COMMENT ON RULE rtest ON test IS 'rtest';
> > The last point I've noticed, there is no VERBOSE entry after VACUUM FULL
> > ANALYZE command anymore.
>
> See commit 921059bd6, above (it's not 100% clear to me that's intended to
> reject VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE and not just reject VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE
> VERBOSE, but I tentatively assume it's intentional).
Right. Understood.
> > I'm not sure how this patch should be commited. Can it be commited
> > outside the commitfest? Otherwise add it to the next commitfest please
> > in order not to forget it.
>
> I've done https://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1661/
Thank you!
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
