> On 9 Jun 2018, at 19:05, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >> When reading the JIT developer documentation, a few small wordsmithing issues >> stood out (although this may be due to me not being a native english >> speaker). >> The attached patch fixes these to what I think the sentences inteded to say. > > Committed with a few adjustments.
Thanks, I’m honoured to get the first commit. > I'm also pretty sure that Andres did in fact mean "...even for faster > queries", since an LRU cache of JIT functions should be particularly > useful for OLTP queries that are already individually fast enough to > make per-execution JIT compilation overhead prohibitively expensive. Ah, I completely misunderstood that part (apparently) but that make sense. cheers ./daniel
