On 25/10/2023 00:18, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:09:54PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
I'm able to reproduce the speedup with the provided benchmark on an Apple
M1 Pro (which appears to have the required instructions).  There was almost
no change for the 512-byte case, but there was a ~60% speedup for the
4096-byte case.

However, I couldn't produce any noticeable speedup with Heikki's pg_waldump
benchmark [0].  I haven't had a chance to dig further, unfortunately.
Assuming I'm not doing something wrong, I don't think such a result should
necessarily disqualify this optimization, though.

Actually, since the pg_waldump benchmark likely only involves very small
WAL records, it would make sense that there isn't much difference.
*facepalm*

No need to guess, pg_waldump -z will tell you what the record size is. And you can vary it by changing the checkpoint interval and/or pgbench scale factor: if you checkpoint frequently or if the database is larger, you get more full-page images which makes the records larger on average, and vice versa.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)



Reply via email to