On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:31 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > Another option might be to just change the hash indexing code to follow > the correct protocol, locking and calling MarkBufferDirty() in those 3 > call sites. Marking the buffer dirty is easy, but making sure that it's > locked might require some refactoring. Robert, would following the > right protocol here affect performance?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question. Are you asking whether dirtying buffers unnecessarily might be slower than not doing that? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
