On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:03 AM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote: > > Thanks for working on this. I will be relieved once this is finally > > taken care of. > > +1, and many thanks for your attention to the patchset and all the details!
Cool. I committed that and back-patched to v14, and here's the rest. 0001 makes the terminology change that I proposed earlier, and then 0002 is the remainder of what was in the previous patch set that wasn't covered by what I committed already, with a few adjustments. In particular, I preferred to stick with "avoid" rather than changing to "prevent," and I thought it was clearer to refer to "failures" plural rather than "failure" collective. These are arguable decisions, though. I propose to commit these changes only to master. I have included a fairly long paragraph about that in the commit message for 0002. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v11-0002-Reword-messages-about-impending-M-XID-exhaustion.patch
Description: Binary data
v11-0001-Talk-about-assigning-rather-than-generating-new-.patch
Description: Binary data
