On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 03:03, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > > It's certainly not a show-stopper. I do believe the patch makes some > > improvements. The reason I'd prefer to see either "and" or "and/or" > > in place of "or" is because the text is trying to imply that many of > > these operations can run at the same time. I'm struggling to > > understand why, given that there could be many sorts and many hashes > > going on at once that we'd claim it could only be one *or* the other. > > If we have 12 sorts and 4 hashes then that's not "several sort or hash > > operations", it's "several sort and hash operations". Of course, it > > could just be sorts or just hashes, so "and/or" works fine for that. > > Yes, I see your point and went with "and", updated patch attached.
Looks good to me. David
