On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 12:00 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> Should there be a way to have a separate "execution" search_path?
I hadn't considered that and I like that idea for a few reasons:
* a lot of the problem cases are for functions that don't need to
access tables at all, e.g., in an index expression.
* it avoids annoyances with pg_temp, because that's not searched for
functions/operators anyway
* perhaps we could force the object search_path to be empty for
IMMUTABLE functions?
I haven't thought it through in detail, but it seems like a promising
approach.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
