On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > One more doubt about naming. Calling function > _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts, > ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck) > as > (void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir, > &requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false); > looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6 > arguments.
I've added the comment clarifying this argument usage. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
0001-Skip-checking-of-scan-keys-required-for-direction-v6.patch
Description: Binary data