On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One more doubt about naming. Calling function
> _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts,
> ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck)
> as
> (void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir,
> &requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false);
> looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6
> arguments.

I've added the comment clarifying this argument usage.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment: 0001-Skip-checking-of-scan-keys-required-for-direction-v6.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to