Hi, > I think it would be better to just remove the "consensus" part of your > mail, and just put down the real reason why each patch is being RfC-ed > or rejected. That is, don't imply that there are hackers that OK-ed it > when there are none, and inform patch authors directly about the > reasons why the patch is being revoked; so without "see consensus in > [0]".
That's fair enough. I will use "It's been decided" or something like this next time to avoid any confusion. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
