On 01.09.23 12:44, Michael Paquier wrote:
I am not sure what you have in mind, but IMO any solution would live
better as long as a solution is:
- not linked to hba.c, handled in a separate code path.
- linked to all configuration files where comments are supported, if
need be.
If I understood you correctly: You mean an independent feature that i.e. gets raw lines and parses the inline #comments.

Doing so we could indeed avoid the trouble of messing around with the hba.c logic, and it would be accessible to other config files. Very interesting thought! It sounds like a much more elegant solution.

Perhaps others have more opinions.
--
Michael

If I hear no objections, I'll try to sketch it as you suggested.

Thanks again for the feedback

Jim



Reply via email to