On 2023-Aug-29, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 08:17:10AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > > Agree that done that way one could easily grep the events from the > > source code and match them with wait_event_names.txt. Then I don't > > think the "search" issue in the code is still a concern with the > > current proposal. > > It could still be able to append WAIT_EVENT_ to the first column of > the file. I'd just rather keep it shorter.
Yeah, I have a mild preference for keeping the prefix, but it's mild because I also imagine that if somebody doesn't see the full symbol name when grepping they will think to remove the prefix. So only -0.1. I think the DOCONLY stuff should be better documented; they make no sense without looking at the commit message for fa88928470b5. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
