On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:56 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had a look at the patch 0001. > > It looks OK to me, but here are a couple of comments: > > ====== > > 1. Is this fix intended for PG16? >
Yes. > I found some mention of this GUC old name lurking in the release v16 notes > [1]. > That should be changed as well but we can do that as a separate patch just for v16. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
