On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 17:14 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> + Index quals are better than equivalent index filters because bitmap
> index scans can only use index quals
It seems there's consensus that:
* Index Filters (Tomas's patch and the topic of this thread) are more
general, because they can work on any expression, e.g. 1/x, which can
throw an error if x=0.
* Index quals are more optimizable, because such operators are not
supposed to throw errors or have side effects, so we can evaluate them
before determining visibility.
I wouldn't describe one as "better" than the other, but I assume you
meant "more optimizable".
It's interesting that there's overlap in utility between Tomas's
current patch and Peter's work on optimizing SAOPs. But I don't see a
lot of tension there -- it seems like Tomas's patch will always be
useful for filters that might throw an error (or have other side
effects).
Is there any part of the design here that's preventing this patch from
moving forward? If not, what are the TODOs for the current patch, or is
it just waiting on more review?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
