On 8/15/23 15:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2023-Aug-16, Michael Paquier wrote:Personally I think backpatching 28b5726 has a really low risk of breaking anything.I agree about the low-risk argument, though. This is just new code.Here's a way to think about it. If 16.1 was already out, would we add libpq support for Close to 16.2?
Seems pretty clearly a "no" to me. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
