Hello, On 2023-Aug-12, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-08-08 12:45:05 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > > Any chance you could your benchmark? I don't see as much of a regression > > > vs 16 > > > as you... > > > > Sure. The results are promising for me too: > > > > nclients = 1, execution time = 13.743 > > nclients = 2, execution time = 7.552 > > nclients = 4, execution time = 4.758 > > nclients = 8, execution time = 3.035 > > nclients = 16, execution time = 2.172 > > nclients = 32, execution time = 1.959 > > nclients = 64, execution time = 1.819 > > nclients = 128, execution time = 1.583 > > nclients = 256, execution time = 1.631 > > Nice. We are consistently better than both 15 and "post integer parsing 16". Since the wins from this patch were replicated and it has been pushed, I understand that this open item can be marked as closed, so I've done that. Thanks, -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Hay dos momentos en la vida de un hombre en los que no debería especular: cuando puede permitírselo y cuando no puede" (Mark Twain)
