On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:46:58AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:37:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:22:09AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >>> Looking at the rest of the ignored patterns, the only remaining one would be >>> DEALLOCATE, which AFAICS doesn't have a query_jumble_ignore tag for now. >> >> This one seems to be simple as well with a location field, looking >> quickly at its Node. > > Agreed, it should be as trivial to implement as for the 2pc commands :)
Perhaps not as much, actually, because I was just reminded that DEALLOCATE is something that pg_stat_statements ignores. So this makes harder the introduction of tests. Anyway, I guess that your own extension modules have a need for a query ID compiled with these fields ignored? For now, I have applied the 2PC bits independently, as of 638d42a. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
