On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 05:20:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes: >> On 02/06/18 17:09, Tom Lane wrote: >>> More concerning is that RHEL6 is on 1.0.1e: > >> I was only thinking of requiring 1.0.2 on Windows. > > Ah. Personally, I don't care about that case, but maybe somebody > else wants to speak for it?
That's what I meant as well. Cutting the minimal OpenSSL version on Linux would not come I think without complains so the requirements are way higher. I know of companies compiling and running benchmarks of PostgreSQL on past RHEL and SUSE versions, linking to what's locally available for simplicity. A script which reports the version of OpenSSL should be simple enough for MSVC. And I am ready to bet that at least hamerkop is not using OpenSSL 1.0.2, so a simple switch would most likely cause the buildfarm to go red. I am attaching in CC the maintainers of the Windows animals so as they can comment. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
