On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:25 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I don't think that it makes sense to invent yet another rule for > > .git-blame-ignore-revs, though. Will we need another buildfarm member > > to enforce that rule, too? > > We could a test that fails when there's some mis-indented code. That seems > like it might catch things earlier?
It definitely would. That would go a long way towards addressing my concerns. But I suspect that that would run into problems that stem from the fact that the buildfarm is testing something that isn't all that simple. Don't typedefs need to be downloaded from some other blessed buildfarm animal? -- Peter Geoghegan
