Charles Cui <charles.cui1...@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a new type defined like this
> CREATE TYPE thrift_binary (
> INPUT = thrift_binary_in,
> OUTPUT = thrift_binary_out,
> LIKE = bytea
> );
> in thrift_binary_in, it accepts cstring and returns thrift_binary.
OK, that's what it should do.
> And in
> this function I returned a bytea because the create type tells the system
> thrift_binary and bytea are the same.
Sure, PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P() would work in the C code. I think it might be
worth inventing a macro PG_RETURN_THRIFT_BINARY_P that's a thin wrapper
around that, just for clarity's sake, but it doesn't matter functionally.
> However, the test passes only when I
> explicitly tell thrift_binary_in to return a bytea (change the return type
> from thrift_binary to bytea), and it does not work when returns
> thrift_binary.
What do you mean by "the test passes" (or doesn't pass)? What do you
mean by "tell thrift_binary_in to return a bytea"? You just said you
were already doing that.
This works for me:
regression=# create type thrift_binary;
CREATE TYPE
regression=# create function thrift_binary_in(cstring) returns thrift_binary
regression-# strict immutable language internal as 'byteain';
NOTICE: return type thrift_binary is only a shell
CREATE FUNCTION
regression=# create function thrift_binary_out(thrift_binary) returns cstring
regression-# strict immutable language internal as 'byteaout';
NOTICE: argument type thrift_binary is only a shell
CREATE FUNCTION
regression=# CREATE TYPE thrift_binary (
regression(# INPUT = thrift_binary_in,
regression(# OUTPUT = thrift_binary_out,
regression(# LIKE = bytea
regression(# );
CREATE TYPE
I cheated here by pointing to byteain/byteaout instead of C functions
that'd actually do what you want, but CREATE TYPE doesn't know that.
I suspect you may have forgotten the initial dummy creation of
thrift_binary as a "shell type".
regards, tom lane
