On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 05:50, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm currently thinking it's > a bad idea to backpatch this but I'd consider it more if someone else > thought it was a good idea or if more people came along complaining > about poor plan choice in plans containing WindowAggs. Currently, it > seems better not to destabilise plans in the back branches. (CC'd Tim, > who reported #17862, as he may have an opinion on this) > I agree it's better not to destabilise plans in the back branches. Tim
