On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:59 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>
> About 2,3,4, it seems you should use "if (am_leader_apply_worker())" instead 
> of
> "if (!am_leader_apply_worker())" because only leader apply worker should 
> invoke
> this function.
>

Hi Hou-san,

Thanks for your review!

Oops. Of course, you are right. My cut/paste typo was mostly confined
to the post, but there was one instance also in the patch.

Fixed in v2.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment: v2-0001-Simplify-worker-type-checks.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to