Em sex, 28 de jul de 2023 11:54 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:45:22PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > Skimming the tree there doesn't seem to be any callers which aren't > exiting or > > ereporting on failure so the real-world impact seems low. That being > said, > > silencing static analyzers could be reason enough to delay allocation. > > A different reason would be out-of-core code that uses rmtree() in a > memory context where the leak would be an issue if facing a failure > continuously? Delaying the allocation after the OPENDIR() seems like > a good practice anyway. > Thanks for the commit, Michael. best regards, Ranier Vilela
