On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:15 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > <kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think it's appropriate to add on the restrictions page. (But > > > > mentioning that this > > > restriction is only for subscriber) > > > > > > > > If the list were larger, then the restrictions page could be divided > > > > into publisher > > > and subscriber restrictions. But not for one very specific restriction. > > > > > > > > > > Okay, how about something like: "The UPDATE and DELETE operations > > > cannot be applied on the subscriber for the published tables that > > > specify REPLICA IDENTITY FULL when the table has attributes with > > > datatypes (e.g point or box) that don't have a default operator class > > > for Btree or Hash. This won't be a problem if the table has a primary > > > key or replica identity defined for it."? > > > > Thanks for discussing and giving suggestions. But it seems that the first > > sentence is difficult to read for me. How about attached? > > > > The last line seems repetitive to me. So, I have removed it. Apart > from that patch looks good to me. Sergie, Peter, and others, any > thoughts?
The v5 patch LGTM. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
