> On 21 Mar 2023, at 06:03, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:54 AM Gregory Stark (as CFM) <stark....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 14:59, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> But I think the bigger problem for this patch set is that the >>> design-level feedback from >>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoaiTNj4DgQy42OT9JmTTP1NWcMV%2Bke0i%3D%2Ba7%3DVgnzqGXw%40mail.gmail.com >>> hasn't really been addressed, AFAICS. ri_LookupKeyInPkRelPlanIsValid >>> is still trivial in v7, and that still seems wrong to me. And I still >>> don't know how we're going to avoid changing the semantics in ways >>> that are undesirable, or even knowing precisely what we did change. If >>> we don't have answers to those questions, then I suspect that this >>> patch set isn't going anywhere. >> >> Amit, do you plan to work on this patch for this commitfest (and >> therefore this release?). And do you think it has a realistic chance >> of being ready for commit this month? > > Unfortunately, I don't think so. This thread has stalled with the patch not building and/or applying for a while, so I am going to mark this Returned with Feebdback. Please feel free to resubmit to a future CF when there is renewed interest/time to work on this. -- Daniel Gustafsson
