On 2023-Jul-04, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Perhaps we could have autovacuum check for it, and do it > > separately of vacuum proper.) > > Being able to reuse some of the worker/launcher parts from autovacuum > could make things easier for a bgworker implementation, perhaps? TBH I don't understand what you are thinking about. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "I can see support will not be a problem. 10 out of 10." (Simon Wittber) (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-12/msg00159.php)
