> On 8 May 2023, at 09:10, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: > > On 03.05.23 23:02, Paul Jungwirth wrote: >> Thank you again for the review. Here is a patch with most of your feedback >> addressed. Sorry it has taken so long! These patches are rebased up to >> 1ab763fc22adc88e5d779817e7b42b25a9dd7c9e >> (May 3). > > Here are a few small fixup patches to get your patch set compiling cleanly. > > Also, it looks like the patches 0002, 0003, and 0004 are not split up > correctly. 0002 contains tests using the FOR PORTION OF syntax introduced in > 0003, and 0003 uses the function build_period_range() from 0004.
These patches no longer apply without a new rebase. Should this patch be closed in while waiting for the prequisite of adding btree_gist to core mentioned upthread? I see no patch registered in the CF for this unless I'm missing sometihng. -- Daniel Gustafsson
