At Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:32:50 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote in > Hi, > > On 6/30/23 5:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: > >> After taking another look at this, I wonder if it'd be better to fail > >> as > >> soon as we see the database or user name is too long instead of > >> lugging > >> them around when authentication is destined to fail.
For the record, if I understand Nathan correctly, it is what I suggested in my initial post. If this is correct, +1 for the suggestion. me> I think we might want to consider outright rejecting the me> estblishment of a connection when the given database name doesn't me> fit the startup packet > > If we're agreed that we aren't going to truncate these identifiers, > > that seems like a reasonable way to handle it. > > > > Yeah agree, thanks Nathan for the idea. > I'll work on a new patch version proposal. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
