Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> As a whole, I'd like to think that this is an improvement even for
> stable branches with these weird isspace() handlings, so I'm OK with
> the current status in all the branches.
Sounds like we're all content with that.
> There's an argument about \v,
> IMO, but I won't fight hard for it either even if it would be more
> consistent with the way array values are handled.
I'd be okay with adding \v to the set of whitespace characters in
scan.l and scanner_isspace (and other affected places) for v17.
Don't want to back-patch it though.
regards, tom lane
