Hi, > Pretty sure that reopening an already rejected patch that is competing > with compression dictionaries (which the rest of us are currently > focusing on) will achieve anything.
Ooops, I didn't mean to be sarcastic: s/will achieve/will not achieve/ My apologies. > Consider joining the compression > dictionaries effort instead [1]. During the discussion with the > community it ended up being a TOAST improvement after all. So we could > use your expertise in this area. > > [1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/3626/ -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
