On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 05:09:59PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 02:30:34PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: >> Hmm, the discussion seems to be based on the assumption that argv[0] >> can be safely redirected to a different memory location. If that's the >> case, we can prpbably rearrange the array, even if there's a small >> window where ps might display a confusing command line, right? > > If that's the extent of the breakage, then it seems alright to me.
Okay by me to live with this burden. > I've attached a new version of the patch that omits the > POSIXLY_CORRECT stuff. This looks OK at quick glance, though you may want to document at the top of getopt_long() the reordering business with the non-options? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
