On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 1:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:57 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 2:53 PM Robert Sjöblom > > <robert.sjob...@fortnox.se> wrote: > > > > > > Attached is the revised version. > > > > > > > v4 looks good to me. > > > > The latest version looks good to me as well. I think we should > backpatch this change as this is a user-facing message change in docs > and code. What do you guys think? >
I do not know the exact criteria for deciding to back-patch, but I am not sure back-patching is so important for this one. It is not a critical bug-fix, and despite being a user-facing change, there is no functional change. Also, IIUC the previous docs existed for 6 years without problem. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
