On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:06:18PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > They only support the types that they were actually being used with. If you > need another type, feel free to add it.
FWIW, I agree with Tomas that this is an oversight that should be fixed in v16, saving from the need to have a copy of deconstruct_array_builtin() in extensions. Same argument here: couldn't it be possible that an extension does multiple array constructs and deconstructs in a single code path? We have patterns like that in core as well. For instance, see extension_config_remove(). -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
