On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:24 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:16:12PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 8:05 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Considering that this is a parallel plan, I don't think there's any > >> mystery about why an ORDER-BY-less query might have unstable output > >> order; the only mystery is why more of the buildfarm hasn't failed. > >> Can we just add "ORDER BY t1.id" to this query? It looks like you > >> get the same PHJ plan, although now underneath Sort/Gather Merge. > > > > Yes, this was an oversight on my part. Attached is the patch that does > > just what you suggested. > > Confirmed that adding an ORDER BY adds a Sort node between a Gather > Merge and a Parallel Hash Full Join, not removing coverage. > > This has fallen through the cracks and conchuela has failed again > today, so I went ahead and applied the fix on HEAD. Thanks!
Thanks!
