On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 5:13 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> writes: > > Hmm, maybe we can additionally check if the PHV needs to be evaluated > > above the join. If so it cannot be removed. > Yeah, that seems to make sense, and it squares with the existing > comment saying that PHVs used above the join can't be removed. > Pushed that way. Thanks for pushing it! I've closed the open item for it. Thanks Richard
