Nikhil Benesch <nikhil.bene...@gmail.com> writes: > I took a look at 0002 because I attempted a similar but more surgical > fix in [0]. > I spotted a few opportunities for further reducing state tracked by > `ArrayCount`.
Wow, thanks for looking! I've not run these suggestions to ground (and won't have time for a few days), but they sound very good. regards, tom lane