Nikhil Benesch <nikhil.bene...@gmail.com> writes:
> I took a look at 0002 because I attempted a similar but more surgical
> fix in [0].
> I spotted a few opportunities for further reducing state tracked by
> `ArrayCount`.

Wow, thanks for looking!  I've not run these suggestions to ground
(and won't have time for a few days), but they sound very good.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to