On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 12:59:35AM +0800, jian he wrote: > Add function pg_dissect_walfile_name() to report the segment and timeline > values of WAL file names (Bharath Rupireddy) > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h= > 13e0d7a603852b8b05c03b45228daabffa0cced2 > the function rename to pg_split_walfile_name.
Fixed. I copied the commit that did the rename, but forgot to actually update the release note text to match. > seems didn't mention pg_input_is_valid,pg_input_error_info? > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-info.html# > FUNCTIONS-INFO-VALIDITY-TABLE Good point. I incorrectly interpreted the commit text as part of our test infrastuture and not the addition of two SQL functions: Add test scaffolding for soft error reporting from input functions. pg_input_is_valid() returns boolean, while pg_input_error_message() returns the primary error message if the input is bad, or NULL if the input is OK. The main reason for having two functions is so that we can test both the details-wanted and the no-details-wanted code paths. I have added this release note item: <!-- Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2022-12-09 [1939d2628] Add test scaffolding for soft error reporting from input --> <listitem> <para> Add functions pg_input_is_valid() and pg_input_error_message() to check for type conversion errors (Tom Lane) </para> </listitem> -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
