"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:26 AM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
>> Clearly any client using libpq can conveniently call code which is in
>> libpq.
> Clearly there are clients that don't use libpq. JDBC comes to mind.
Yeah. I'm also rather concerned about the bloat factor; it's
hardly unlikely that this line of development would double the
size of libpq, to add functionality that only a small minority
of applications would use. A client-side implementation also has
no choice but to cope with multiple server versions, and to
figure out what it's going to do about a too-new server.
Up to now we broke compatibility between libpq and server maybe
once every couple decades, but it'd be once a year for this.
regards, tom lane
