Hi, > I agree that va_tag can have another use. But since we are going to > make varatt_external variable in size (otherwise I don't see how it > could be really **extendable**) I don't think this is the right > approach.
On second thought, perhaps we are talking more or less about the same thing? It doesn't matter what will be used as a sign of presence of a varint bitmask in the pointer. My initial proposal to use ToastCompressionId for this is probably redundant since va_tag > 18 will already tell that. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
