On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > Did it that way in V9 attached and the sorting does look like what > we expect now.
Yes, the order of the items in the individual tables is fine, but this is still a bit incorrect for the classes? Note that the tables for the LWLock and Lock are still in reverse order :) +foreach $waitclass (sort keys %hashwe) Meaning that you may want to add an extra case-insensitive rule for the sorting on this line for the SGML docs (also the C part, I guess, but we care less). > Agree, V9 does now apply on top of > v2-0001-Introducing-WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION-and-WAIT_EVENT_B.patch > (just shared in [1]). If you don't send both patches in the same message the CF bot is going to complain as v9-0001 is not able to apply independently of the other patch v2-0001 on the other thread (you could do a git apply -2 -v2, for example). -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
