On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 12:25:20PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > [RMT hat] > > I read through the original thread[1] to understand the use case and also > the concerns, but I need to study [1] and this thread a bit more before I > can form an opinion. > > The argument that there is "demand from users" is certainly one I relate to, > but there have been high-demand features in the past (e.g. MERGE, SQL/JSON) > that have been reverted and released later due to various concerns around > implementation, etc. The main job of the RMT is to ensure a major release is > on time and is as stable as possible, which will be a major factor into any > decisions if there is lack of community consensus on an open item.
(note: Not RMT this year) This thread had no replies for the last two weeks, and beta1 is planned for next week. Alexander, what are your plans here? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
