On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 14:27, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:18 AM Matthias van de Meent > <boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agreed; and that's why I'm not against removing the specific wording > > of the item. This may not have been clearly described in my previous > > mail, but I would instead like to see a TODO list item which covers > > the need to improve the number of cases where we provide actionable > > advice, and specifically those cases where there is not One Obvious > > Issue (OOI;s like when getting close to wraparound; or close > > checkpoints, or ...). > > My vote is for just removing the item, rather than putting it on the > not wanted list. I don't think it's useful to put things as general as > what you say here on the list. But putting this item in the not wanted > section might imply that it's not an area we're looking to improve, > which as you say, is false.
That makes sense. Agreed. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent
