On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:57 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:08:32PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > > After 495ed0e, do these references to Windows SDK 8.1 still make sense?
> As listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK, > likely not. What do you think about the attached? LGTM.