Thanks a lot for the clarification! The "..." looks enigmatic right now. I think cstring would save newcomers some head-scratching.
Open to suggestions though. Best regards, Steve On Sun, 14 May 2023 at 22:36, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Steve Chavez <st...@supabase.io> writes: > > I found "..." confusing in some comments, so this patch changes it to > > "cstring". Which seems to be the intention after all. > > Those comments are Berkeley-era, making them probably a decade older > than the "cstring" pseudotype (invented in b663f3443). Perhaps what > you suggest is an improvement, but I'm not sure that appealing to > original intent can make the case. > > regards, tom lane >
