Kirk Wolak <wol...@gmail.com> writes: > \et <TAB> > Would specifically let me complete the Trigger_Name, but find the function
Hmm, I wonder how useful that's really going to be, considering
that trigger names aren't unique across tables. Wouldn't it
need to be more like "\et table-name trigger-name"?
Also, in a typical database I bet a large fraction of pg_trigger.tgname
entries are going to be "RI_ConstraintTrigger_something". Are we going
to suppress those?
regards, tom lane
