On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > On 4 May 2023, at 14:18, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >> On 4 May 2023, at 14:09, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Hmm, I'm kinda -1 on them having the same name visible in the >>> contexts dump --- that seems very confusing. How about naming >>> the hash "EventTriggerCacheHash" or so? >> >> I think the level is the indicator here, but I have no strong opinions, >> EventTriggerCacheHash is fine by me. > > The attached trivial diff does that, parking this in the next CF.
+1 for EventTriggerCacheHash -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
