On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:17 AM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Although I didn't mention the issue with single user mode in my > > introductory email (the situation there is just appalling IMV), it > > seems like I might not be able to ignore that problem while I'm > > working on this patch. Declaring that as out of scope for this doc > > patch series (on pragmatic grounds) feels awkward. I have to work > > around something that is just wrong. For now, the doc patch just has > > an "XXX" item about it. (Hopefully I'll think of a more natural way of > > not fixing it.) > > If it helps, I've gone ahead with some testing and polishing on that, and > it's close to ready, I think (CC'd you). I'd like that piece to be separate > and small enough to be backpatchable (at least in theory).
That's great news. Not least because it unblocks this patch series of mine. -- Peter Geoghegan
