Hi, > This is a very good catch and a suggestion. I've slightly reworked the patch, > and I also made this static assertion to have less indirection and, > therefore, make it easier to understand the premise. > Version 2 is attached.
``` sizeof((BackgroundWorker *)NULL)->bgw_library_name ``` I'm pretty confident something went wrong with the parentheses in v2. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
