On 4/19/23 9:34 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:31 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote:To be clear, is the proposal to remove both "check_strxfrm_bug" and "TRUST_STRXFRM"?Given a bunch of folks who have expertise in this area of code all agree with removing the above as part of the collation cleanups targeted for v16, I'm inclined to agree. I don't really see the need for an explicit RMT action, but based on the consensus this seems OK to add as an open item.Thanks all. I went ahead and removed check_strxfrm_bug().
Thanks! For housekeeping, I put this into "Open Items" and marked it as resolved.
I could write a patch to remove the libc strxfrm support, but since Jeff recently wrote new code in 16 to abstract that stuff, he might prefer to look at it?
I believe we'd be qualifying this as an open item too? If so, let's add it. Thanks, Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
